Bitchener & Knoch
One of the more interesting essays for me this
semester. That may have something to do with the science geek in me, but I
really appreciate the way the study and testing adhered to the basic precepts
of evidence supported inquiry. There was a control group used as there would be
in any other science experiment. According to the results of the testing,
students provided with WCF directly post-test, showed a marked improvement in
accuracy and the ability to retain and recall the information some seven weeks
later. Students provided with all three forms of WCF tended to outperform the
ones who hadn’t. I guess this is the result I would have expected and it seems
to be common sense. It would be interesting to know if these methods have been
adapted by a teacher and used over the course of a semester. I am wondering if
it is feasible to do so in a real world setting. An experiment in a controlled
setting is one thing, but to implement it in a class room setting and to
publish the results would be an even more impressive experiment. Ultimately
though, Oral and written feedback work best in combination and that the sooned
the feedback is provided to the student, the better.
I always find that I get a lot of resistance from students when I use the in-direct feedback method during tutorials. I find more students prefer direct feedback with the explanation right after.
ReplyDelete